Danas, 31 December 2010Monarchy for Serbia
by Prince Alexander Karageorgevitch
The whole of my life I’ve been following and monitoring
events in my country of origin and destiny. Over half a century I did that from
far away, the last ten years from inside it! I am an optimist by nature, and
have to be like that because of my origin and because of the future.
Serbia has come a long way since 1 December 1918 when it
invested its sovereignty into the union of the South Slav nations called the
Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, until 21 May 2006 when the State
Union of Serbia and Montenegro disintegrated following the referendum in
Montenegro. Now that Serbia is an independent country again, there is no need
for any kind of concession to other constituent nations or countries. Now we are
on our own and responsible only for our destiny and our deeds. At this moment,
we are pretty much left in-between of what we are, what we want and we could be,
and what we are offered to be without alternative! Sometimes I believe that we
are choosing between things where there is no actual choice.
They say “We want to go to Europe”, it is not about formal
membership within some association, but about the choice of values that make
Europe what it is. Who is stopping us to adopt these values, if we feel them as
our own? But here it is more important which values we will adopt first, easy
ones which bring just a superficial European look alike, or the substantial and
hard to carry out ones. Who is stopping us to integrate with ourselves, if we
want integration? Who is stopping us to unite with ourselves before we unite
with Portugal, Malta or Finland?
Speaking of the image of the independent state of Serbia
throughout time, we must say that than we speak mainly about the monarchy. Since
1830, when Serbia was granted a certain degree of independence as a
Principality, until 1 December 1918, we are talking about 88 years of constant
progress and development, liberating territories and being perceived as a part
of Europe. There is no need for comparison with the last four years, not in
length nor in quality. No matter if it is the Principality of Serbia under the
Obrenovic dynasty, or the Kingdom restituted by King Milan in 1882 followed by
his son Aleksandar and then King Petar I, it was always a European country. Not
because of its geographical position, nothing has moved since than and we are in
the same place, but for the perception of it, from the inside and from the
outside. Ever since the First Serbian uprising, Karadjordje and his insurgent
comrades knew that they were fighting for the liberty of European Serbia. At the
dawn of the wars for independence in 1876-78, the Serbian Government
commissioned a French journalist to publish at least one affirmative article per
month in two leading Paris magazines. Do you think that this something that we
can achieve today? The problem is that people usually fall into the trap of
thinking that everything is starting from them, and here is another problem of
ours. We claim that we know our history and respect tradition, but I am afraid
that this is not the fact. When I speak about it, I equally praise the
achievements of both our dynasties that paved the road for modern Serbia.
Talking about all of this, I have to say: I am not in power and not in
opposition! I am part of history as same as today will be the history tomorrow,
as the future will become history as it happens! The future is based on history!
A future without history is just like a house without a foundation!
Speaking of the image, today we have state symbols, a flag, a
coat of arms and the anthem of the Kingdom of Serbia, It was not easy to re
introduce them, but now, a few years later, people who were the hardest
opposition to this “entering of constitutional monarchy trough the back door”,
are the most enthusiastic promoters of our symbols. This is good, but this is
not enough. If we want to know who we are and what we stand for, we must define
these things before we join the European Union, as it will be too late to think
about it afterwards. We need this kind of comparative advantage to the rest of
the countries from so called “New Europe”.
I meet many people in our country and abroad. I have many
friends and acquaintances. Friendship has to be constructed and nurtured. You
rarely inherit friends, but have to make ones, and especially there where they
are in short supply, where they are a minority. Countries are the same as
people, they need friends. They need friends which can bring them into the
circles of friends that they couldn’t reach on their own. This is the reason why
I am using every opportunity to bring friends, important people to Belgrade to
see and feel, to get their own experience of Serbia. I am very proud to
contribute to different activities which are aimed to improve the image of
Serbia, whether it was the City Break conference, Euro Song, some scientific
conference or Belgrade candidacy for the European capital of culture. Of course
there will always will be nasty comments in some media, like “they party again”,
but they do not understand basic principles of friendship and bonding between
people.
It is my obligation, as I am speaking critically, to mention
that in many areas things have significantly improved. It is difficult to see
due to the huge inherited and imported problems, but it is obviously present.
That improvement shouldn’t be overestimated, but not to be underestimated, as
well. In other, more stable and happier circumstances, such progress should be
recognized and appreciated, but at the present it is constantly kept in shadow
of collateral events. But, nevertheless, progress made gives hope and brings
optimism. Of course, progress in one field which is not accompanied by progress
in other fields is just in vain, because progress, as friendship, should be
nurtured and maintained.
I firmly believe in the benefits of Constitutional Monarchy
in Serbia. We need stability, unity and continuity. Arguments in favor of that
can be seen everywhere. Look around you, and if you were hoping and fighting for
that, then you are a happy person, and I congratulate you on that! But, look
again, and see how many other people feel the same way! I am afraid that you
won’t see much of them. If you believe that Republic is cheaper than
Constitutional Monarchy, make another calculation. If you believe that a citizen
makes a greater influence in a Republic than in a Constitutional Parliamentary
Monarchy, reconsider what polity is present in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium,
Netherlands, Luxemburg, Spain, Japan, Australia, Canada, New Zealand …
Reconsider if Pol Pot was better than Sihanouk, Mengistu than Selassie,
Chaushesku than Michael, Zivkov then Simeon, or today’s Afghanistan comparing to
the state of King Mohammed Zahir!
We shouldn’t follow ideological clichés. Each country and
each nation has a better and worse option of polity at any given time. For
Serbia today it is Parliamentary Constitutional Democracy! |