THE
ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY SERMON ON
THE OCCASION OF THE EIGHTIETH
BIRTHAY OF HM QUEEN ELIZABETH II
London Thursday 15th June 2006. -
HRH Crown Prince Alexander who was
present this morning at the
Thanksgiving Service at St Paul’s
Cathedral for the eightieth birthday
of Her Majesty Queen II is sharing
with the gracious permission of the
Archbishop of Canterbury his sermon.
Archbishop of Canterbury
Sermon
on the occasion of the Service of
Thanksgiving
for
the Eightieth Birthday of Her
Majesty The Queen
St
Paul’s Cathedral
The curse of our age has been the
inhumanity of absolute ideology and
of myths of racial supremacy, the
great lies that have plunged our
continent and our world into
darkness and butchery so many times
since the nineteen twenties. And in
the new century and millennium, what
we have to fear is a toxic mixture
of religion that has become inhuman,
economic power sustained at massive
human cost, and the technologies of
destruction that can be used by
armies and by terrorists alike for
impersonal killing.
Holocaust and Stalinism and
ethnic cleansing, fanaticism and
terror and mass destruction – all
varieties of power without a human
face, demanding blind loyalties and
disregard for the diversity of human
life, all working for a false kind
of unity or solidarity. But these
great lies remind us what a tough
question it is when we ask – as we
so often do these days - what it is
that gives cohesion to a society.
Is it racial identity and
solidarity? a monochrome culture? a
governing ideology or philosophy? In
our country, it is none of those
things; instead, and among the
several other things that give us
such cohesion as we have is a common
loyalty to the monarch. You may
sometimes hear complaints that in
Britain we suffer from being
subjects rather than citizens, and
that this produces a culture of
deference and passivity. But what if
our common allegiance to the monarch
were in fact something that helped
us to be adult citizens?
The identity of the United
Kingdom has had something to do with
the development of a critical
democracy within the framework of
symbol and tradition. At our best,
we have found solidarity in a
network of relationships and
practices quite hard to codify, but
variously connected with the
personal focus that is the monarch.
And the British monarch is not an
absolute ruler demanding mindless
loyalty, but the one who guarantees
space for the rest of society to
argue and negotiate and change, as
mature citizen-societies must, who
‘defends our laws’ as the National
Anthem puts it.
Our experience in the United
Kingdom – not a smooth progression,
not easily won – has shown us
something of what a society might
look like when it refuses to see its
unity and cohesion in abstract
terms, in terms of ideology or race
or even some great imperial project.
After all, in the last half-century
we have made a transition from
Empire to Commonwealth, a transition
whose success no-one could have
guaranteed; yet what remained intact
was a sense of international
convergence and kinship that would
have been a great deal harder,
perhaps impossible, without the
steady presence of a single personal
focus.
In other words, monarchy as it
has developed here is a way of
keeping power human. At the symbolic
centre of our political life is a
person. There are risks to this:
Your Majesty has more reason than
most to know the cost of a culture
fanatically eager for gossip and
trivia and the exposure in public of
what should be private. Yet it is
also true that something of immense
value has been made possible in this
climate. We have seen something of a
monarch who has shared the
vulnerability of ordinary people,
and that has been moving in itself.
But more importantly we have been
able to see a bit more clearly the
personal depth of our monarch’s
faith, more and more evident in
successive broadcasts and
testimonies, and her keen sense – to
borrow the blunt and resonant words
of the Prayer Book – of ‘whose
minister she is’, who she is
answerable to.
And this means that at the hub of
our political life is not only a
person with whose vulnerability we
can identify but a person visibly
standing before God and God’s
judgement in humility and hope.
Monarchy has been for us as citizens
a sign of the humanity at the heart
of power, a sign that we can be held
together not by the furious
rivalries of theory or ethnic
exclusion but by acknowledging the
common debt of our humanity to its
maker and redeemer. The logic of
this kind of monarchy is the logic
of the Christian recognition of
Christ as King – the monarch whose
credentials are to be found in his
human vulnerability and in his utter
dependence upon God his Father.
Birthdays are among the most
vivid reminders we can have of our
common humanity and our common call
to journey through time with each
other. Today, your Majesty, we give
thanks with you simply for the gifts
of life and experience - and for the
beginning of a new year of
challenge; we wish you and Prince
Philip, who has so devotedly
supported you and all that you have
stood for, many more happy years.
But we also give thanks for a human
face to our systems and processes, a
human symbol that helps to hold us
together. May our thanksgiving
strengthen our resolve to resist the
great public inhumanities that still
menace us all. When we try to be
more than human we become less than
human – that much we should have
learned in the past century. So may
God keep us now in human fellowship
as we learn how we may grow in grace
into eternal fellowship with him.